Welcome to the new MIDIRS website!

MIDIRS Midwifery Digest Hot Topic: Why are some voices not heard? Exploring how maternity care can be improved for women with limited English

By Joanne Cull et al

21 June, 2022

2 minutes read

Abstract

There is a robust body of evidence, accumulated over the decades, which shows that limited English proficiency is a key factor associated with poorer maternal and neonatal outcomes. Our work as midwives and researchers has led us to believe that this is a complex, multi-dimensional issue, which we will explore in this article.

We discuss challenges of interpreter use by clinicians and with current interpreting service provision. We propose a range of solutions to improve care for this group of women. Finally, we argue that language must be viewed as an independent variable in research, as it is often conflated with, or hidden by, wider discussions of ethnicity and migration status.

We hope this article will illuminate the challenges of providing high-quality care for women with limited English proficiency and set out a clear road map for reducing the continued inequity.

Language as a key determinant of maternal health

The Confidential Enquiry into Maternal and Child Health (CEMACH) report Why mothers die 2000-2002 noted that ‘there is a particular risk for women…who have little or no command of the English language’ (Lewis 2004:251). Nearly two decades later, these findings were mirrored by the most recent MBRRACE-UK report and the Health Secretary Investigation Branch (HSIB) report into intrapartum stillbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic (Knight et al 2021, HSIB 2021).

Women with limited English proficiency face a range of challenges to access timely, high-quality maternity care: for example, initiation of routine maternity care can be delayed as women might find it difficult to book appointments and understand referral pathways, and telephone triage services often rely on the ability to speak English (Cardwell & Wainwright 2018, McKnight et al 2019). Without accurate communication with maternity care professionals during consultations, there is a risk that vital information will be missed and that informed consent cannot be achieved (Birthrights & Birth Companions 2019, Bridle et al 2021).

Read the full MIDIRS Digest June 2022 Hot Topic

Cull J, Anwar N, Brooks E et al. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, vol 32, no 2, June 2022, pp 142-146

Original article ©MIDIRS 2022

Would you like to read more articles like this? Subscribe to MIDIRS today to receive MIDIRS Midwifery Digest every quarter here.

MIDIRS Monthly – Reflections on my journey from a registered midwife to a PhD midwifery researcher

By Lucy Goddard

2 August, 2024

3 minutes read

MIDIRS Opinion – How Hypnobirthing and a positive birth experience has inspired my fight against the media’s misrepresentations of childbirth

By Gillian Kirkwood

19 July, 2024

14 minutes read

Cookie options

Some of these cookies are necessary to make the site work. We’d also like to use optional cookies to help improve your experience on the site. You can manage your optional cookie preferences below. Using this tool will set a cookie on your device to remember your preferences. Your preferences can be changed at any time.
For more detailed information about the cookies we use, see our Privacy Policy

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and can only be disabled by changing your browser preferences.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies are used to collect and report information on how our website is used. This helps us to improve the website based on the needs and behaviour of our visitors.

Marketing Cookies

We use marketing cookies to help us improve the relevancy of advertising campaigns you receive.

This site uses cookies to store information on your computer

Royal College of Midwives uses cookies for website functionality purposes. For more information, please review our privacy notice or review the settings tab.